Peter L posted what he thought about Redstocking Grandma. She complained to the Editors and got his post deleted.
What ever Peter L wrote sure must have been OFFENSIVE.
It was so OFFENSIVE that Redstocking Grandma felt the need to copy the whole thing and post it again over on HER blog. According to Redstocking Grandma, she preserved those ever so OFFENSIVE words so she can have "...help dealing with the trauma."
She also has the gall to write this in her trauma blog's comments:
"Go to the link. I have been savaged by someone who should be in a psychiatrist's office, not on Open Salon. My crime was deleting comments he made viciously attacking another women. This guy is dangerous to himself and others. He needs to be suspended immediately. The longer he is allowed to break down and act out on Open Salon, the sicker he gets. And I am licensed by the state of New York to make that judgment."
Redstocking Grandma wants to toss Peter L in a mental hospital and she is diagnosing him over the internet.
I guess Redstocking Grandma's friends must not have been comforting her enough because Redstocking Grandma then blogwhored her replication of Peter L's OFFENSIVE post over at Munglular's blog with this comment:
"Peter's tirade against me provided an example of a post that had to be deleted if Open Salon is to remain a viable community. Fortunately the editors agreed. I haven't removed my post on his post because I do want to address some of the points he made. I also want my friends to understand why I might feel a bit traumatized."
To save everyone having to click over to find out what is so fucking OFFENSIVE that it deserved being ratted out to the Editors, here are Peter L's OFFENSIVE words:
"She appears to be taking on the role of both patient diagnosed with bi-polar/schizophrenia plus she herself is the psychiatrist/social worker. Talk about getting your cake and eating it too. If you have read thru some of her posts she comes from this strange angle of seeing patients and scolding psychiatrists but periodically herself needing to be admitted to the psychiatric ward. How bizarre. It's like a police officer who catches criminals and locks them up, himself stealing and being locked up, and then wanting to go back to catching criminals stealing, to lock them up. Can it work that way? ...
I am a very logical and rationale person who had the disservice of growing up under bi-polar people like Lizzy in the Loony bin/Redstocking Grandma but yet was placed into the psychiatric world and accused to be the mentally ill one all because the pressure and madness of my mother and father's household was too much causing me to both rebel and shut down at the same time.
I despise crazy people and just the name loony bin lizzy gives me the creeps (not enough to contact the editor though) The Mardi Gras carnival crap is what I think of when I see Lizzy in the Loony Bins profile pic and its bizarre and creepy to me. I don't mind gay pride but I don't like when people dress up in all that crazy garb under the guise of homosexual liberation."
If what Peter L wrote is so fucking OFFENSIVE, then there is no reason under the sun for Redstocking Grandma to have re-posted it. I don't give a crap about needing to share it with friends. So which is it going to be?
Either it is super duper beyond the pale deserving to be deleted by the editors OFFENSIVE or it isn't.
Redstocking Grandma shouldn't be having it both ways.
The Editors were suckered.
Go on. Complain about this post. Flag it, little censoring cunt ratfinks.
You'll be proving my point.
****
Comments
again, i am new to os, but am very surprised at all the drama. i did read the post by liz re meds for kids. and upon reading the comments i found people getting wound up and telling each other to f***k off. wow.
i did have one guy call me sick for my post on oj simpson. i simply deleted it and plan to ignore the dude. easy. and i read somewhere else that others say things like this dude has a "two by four up his ass." so guess he is just that way.
can't change folks over the internet or face to face for that matter. so ignoring is one solution. just my two cents. :)
thanks for this post.:) and the funny nude photos. especially the bikers.:) too much.
mary
You've got a point here if that's all there was to Peter's post. I agree that RG's including the offensive comment was over the top. Way too much drama for me and too little substance. And, diagnosing over the internet - hmmmm, we could have fun with that one! I'm thinking of a few people that I would like to certify myself, and I have a license in NC - well, okay, it's a driver's license - but still. Good point.
Rated for CCR (Credence Clearwater Revival will never be the same!)
If the CCR t-shirts are all cotton, I'll take a Large.
How about some hardcore Troll nudity? :D
Odette:
"I now desperately want a t-shirt that says, "Censoring Cunt Ratfinks."
I'd pay for that shirt!
I'd like one of those t-shirts, too, if you don't mind.
I agree totally with you about the censorship issue. But I guess you already knew that.
Thumbed.
FREEDOM!!!!!!!!
So this Peter guy is a bit of a jerk and a prude who should avoid Gay Pride events. But I don't see where he's a threat to himself or others or so offensive.
EPriddy will tell you I'm an overly-sensitive guy. But this takes the cake!
This comment is my permission to use "Censoring Cunt Ratfink" to help out those charities of yours.
Thanks to BBE for the suggestion.
How the heck do you delete comments!?
I want to be able to get rid of my own stupid typos, and maintain the pretense of perfection.
HA! Classic is an understatement. Too bad they're imported. Still, they might make a great stocking stuffer :-)
No comments:
Post a Comment